A Combined AHP-PROMETHEE Approach for Portfolio Performance Comparison
نویسندگان
چکیده
Comparing portfolio performance is complex due to the fact that each model dominant in its own risk space. Since there no single measure, research problem how incorporate several different measures into a evaluation allows portfolios be ranked. In this regard, objective of study was develop new comprehensive method for comparing based on multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM). This paper proposes an integrated approach stock market decision making combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), which allow hierarchical finite number alternatives according criteria. hybrid especially advantageous, utilizing strengths both individual methods. AHP enables decomposition constituent parts determination weights criteria, while PROMETHEE investor determine preference function, complete ranking, analysis robustness results. For MCDM study, dimensions are considered criteria: return measures, stability predictability measures. The methodology has been applied real selected basis purpose, weekly data were used sample stocks components STOXX Europe 600 Index period 2000–2020. addition, sensitivity performed investigate strength results method. It suggests simultaneous consideration investor’s attitude towards importance these notably important efficiency estimation process.
منابع مشابه
Leader Culling Using AHP – PROMETHEE Methodology
The candidate selection process involves thoughtful empirical decisions which determine the best fit from a pool of contesting candidates. A wide range of criteria is used to assess the candidates. This paper utilizes an improved PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) methodology which efficiently establishes its applicability and potentiality to solve s...
متن کاملPROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP
This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the Preference Ranking Organisation MeTHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods. Building upon this analysis, recommendations are formulated to integrate into PROMETHEE a number of useful AHP features, especially as regards the design of the decision-making hierarchy (ordering of goals, sub-goals...
متن کاملModified Fuzzy Promethee Approach for Agile Method Selection Using Fuzzy Ahp
1.1 Agile Development The Agile Manifesto explicitly states that priority should be given to ‘‘individuals and interaction over processes and tools, customer collaboration over contract negotiation, working software over comprehensive documentation, and responding to changes over following a plan’’ [1]. Thus these agile principles promotes the flexibility by allowing changes to project requirem...
متن کاملA Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-DEA Approach for Assessing University Performance
-In recent years, with the expansion of existing institutions as well as the establishment of new ones, higher education institutions have suffered the problem of declining available resources. Each university must assess the performance of its critical business units to measure effectiveness and efficiency. The purpose of this study is to assess university performance. In this study, we apply ...
متن کاملA combined goal programming - AHP approach to maintenance selection problem
This paper presents a ‘Lexicographic’ Goal Programming (LGP) approach to define the best strategies for the maintenance of critical centrifugal pumps in an oil refinery. For each pump failure mode, the model allows to take into account the maintenance policy burden in terms of inspection or repair and in terms of the manpower involved, linking them to efficiency-risk aspects quantified as in FM...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Financial Studies
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2227-7072']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11010046